|
|
Post by Spiffshine on Jun 23, 2013 5:39:23 GMT -5
I had that thought too, Andy. I have spent 1's of hours perusing Google's web fonts and have yet to find anything reverse italic. I also did not find a simpson-y font for headers and whatnot here. Oh well... at the end of the day, I just assume that everyone here is sarcastic 90% of the time. |
|
|
|
Post by Andy on Jun 23, 2013 5:48:49 GMT -5
I had that thought too, Andy. I have spent 1's of hours perusing Google's web fonts and have yet to find anything reverse italic. I also did not find a simpson-y font for headers and whatnot here. Oh well... at the end of the day, I just assume that everyone here is sarcastic 90% of the time. Haha, well 'Schoolbell' looks to be the closest to a Simpsons font, but it's no 'Akbar'.  'Rock Salt' isn't too bad either, but a little rough. |
|
|
|
Post by Dalton on Jun 23, 2013 6:35:17 GMT -5
I had that thought too, Andy. I have spent 1's of hours perusing Google's web fonts and have yet to find anything reverse italic. I also did not find a simpson-y font for headers and whatnot here. Oh well... at the end of the day, I just assume that everyone here is sarcastic 90% of the time. Haha, probably a safe assumption  |
|
|
|
Post by President Dude on Jun 23, 2013 13:18:21 GMT -5
I don't get it
|
|
|
|
Post by Spiffshine on Jun 23, 2013 18:30:42 GMT -5
[sar]Are you being sarcastic? Without the special font, I am unsure.[/sar] |
|
|
|
Post by Andy on Jun 23, 2013 19:43:04 GMT -5
Y'know, I'm actually starting to warm to that scroll bar beneath the sarcasm. It really adds emphasis. |
|
|
|
Post by dougsbeard on Jun 24, 2013 7:44:15 GMT -5
That's it folks. Looks like this little feature is not going to happen with the current technology available.  [sar]You might all want to go through a thorough decontamination process, since you carelessly walked into this test area despite the warnings.[/sar] But we're the ones who contaminated it in the first place.  [sar]Blame pantsless dougsbeard. He started it.[/sar] oh sure, blame the guy with no pants on. because he had noooooothing to do with sarcasm, ever |
|
|
|
Post by Smash-a-noid Droid on Jun 24, 2013 20:28:33 GMT -5
I think this may be appropriate  |
|
|
|
Post by Linz on Jun 24, 2013 20:40:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Duff Dawg on Jun 26, 2013 23:37:59 GMT -5
When I try to [testdiv]use the tag inline[/testdiv] I get line breaks because of the div. Changing div to [testspan]span didn't do the trick[/testspan] - the javascript worked, but the text was not transformed. Not sure what I'm doing wrong. When I try to [testdiv]use the tag inline[/testdiv] I get line breaks because of the div. Changing div to [testspan]span didn't do the trick[/testspan] - the javascript worked, but the text was not transformed. Not sure what I'm doing wrong.Apparently this affects objects inside the CODE tag and emoticons as well. [testdiv] :shock:[/testdiv] Spiff run! by posting this thread ur gonna get a whole of lurkers trying to get you add them!! |
|
|
|
Post by Smash-a-noid Droid on Jun 27, 2013 0:01:24 GMT -5
Add me please Spiffshine*lurks some more* suggests we need a sarcasm badge..... |
|
|
|
Post by A Bad Example on Jul 9, 2013 0:58:04 GMT -5
That's it folks. Looks like this little feature is not going to happen with the current technology available. [sar]You might all want to go through a thorough decontamination process, since you carelessly walked into this test area despite the warnings.[/sar] But we're the ones who contaminated it in the first place. [sar]Blame pantsless dougsbeard. He started it.[/sar] You sure? Last I saw Jamvan was also in his skivvies. |
|
